An Agency Used AI to Pull an "SEO Heist": Was It Worth It? We Asked Experts

 There’s no Clooney-esque fascinating rogue. Instead, you’ll discover a story approximately how AI changed into used to create what critics called “a roadmap on a way to wreck the net.”

More especially, how one organisation founder used generative AI to tug off what he called an “search engine marketing heist that stole 3.6M overall site visitors from a competitor.”

To better recognize it, I spoke with two experts in SEO approximately how it took place and whether it without a doubt is the loss of life rattle of the internet.

An AI-Powered search engine marketing Heist

Last month, a small corner of social media was set on fire when tech entrepreneur Jake Ward published the effects of his self-described “SEO heist.”

If you’re now not familiar with SEO, it stands for “search engine optimization.” It’s the manner you are making your internet site greater attractive to engines like google and enhance your website online’s rating inside the effects pages.

For some websites, that means creating the sort of brilliant revel in that people want to search for. To others, it method seeking to game the gadget with reasonably-priced tactics and crap content material.

And there’s no better description than that for what Ward’s company did.

Using 100% AI-generated content material, they have been capable of “steal” 3.6 million perspectives from a competitor.

The plan become a simple one:

Download a competitor’s sitemap. (A listing of all of their internet pages.)

Turn the complete listing into blog titles.

Use the ones titles as activates for an AI content author.

Following this blueprint, it simplest took some hours to crank out 1,800 “new” articles – all without the touch of a human hand.

Was the corporation’s search engine optimization heist successful?

For a shocking amount of time, it did paintings. Over the course of 18 months, Ward’s by-product site garnered 3,six hundred,000 perspectives.

Here’s a have a look at the “stolen” content material’s traffic over two years, taken from Ahrefs, an SEO tool.

Traffic growth for Ward's "stolen" content

That’s the sort of growth that any marketer might salivate over. And salivate they did.

At the time of publishing, a publish on Ward’s LinkedIn profile had hundreds of supportive remarks.

Meanwhile, on X (formerly Twitter), an equally huge variety of comments called the heist “risky,” “draw back,” and “ethically sh***y.”

But in case you’ve labored in search engine optimization or content material advertising,  this shouldn’t have came about.

How did they pull this off?

“I changed into first of all pretty amazed this did paintings – and annoyed, of path!” says Aja Frost, director of Global Growth at HubSpot.

She’s made a profession out of doing the exact opposite of this.

Believe it or no longer, Google has algorithms in vicinity in particular to trap derivative content. That’s why you no longer see the copycat, phrase-salad web sites that had been famous inside the early 2000s.

So why did this tactic work?

“My droop is that [Ward’s] AI-spun articles have been distinct enough at the semantic stage to pass Google’s duplicate content structures,” says Frost.

Ward’s AI tool didn’t rewrite the competitor’s content material; it clearly used it as a template for brand new content.

Head of Content search engine marketing at HubSpot, Rory Hope, provides that the overpowering quantity of content additionally performed a element in this fulfillment.

“The website online involved inside the ‘heist’ was capable of quickly post content material that despatched signals [...] that to start with appeared to Google as unique content material, with intensity that created huge topic coverage at lightning velocity.”

Frost points to the very last piece of the puzzle: the sort of content.

“Ward’s organization used AI to rewrite content from Exceljet, a website supporting human beings use Excel with articles like ‘XLOOKUP vs VLOOKUP’ and ‘How to concatenate in Excel.’ This form of content material in all fairness commodified.”

In different phrases, it’s clean for AI to generate “how-to” articles because the content material is simple with clear answers. There’s not lots need for tone, interpretation, or angle.

It would be more difficult for an AI tool to duplicate content material that required character or first-hand enjoy. So Ward’s tactic likely wouldn’t have worked on, say, an opinion weblog or a news web page with unique reporting.

“Whether it became written by means of a human or no longer [...] it’s probably very just like what AI might generate,” Frost says.

To be clean, while Frost says the content material is similar, that doesn’t imply it is equally valuable.

In reality, there’s a vital distinction.

All of Exceljet’s content is examined and proven by way of an expert in Excel. (That type of attempt is worth some free commercial.) On the other hand, Ward’s content material became published with none oversight from a human expert.

That’s a huge deal when you take into account that generative AI models are at risk of making up fake solutions.

However, this similarity does imply that Exceljet’s sincere content made it a really perfect victim.

A Victimless Crime?

The phrases “stolen” and “heist” got here from Ward’s very own description, maximum in all likelihood calculated to generate controversy and attention. (And to his credit score: Mission completed.)

What his business enterprise did, however, doesn’t certainly rise to the level of a criminal offense. But that doesn’t imply there aren’t victims, although.

Those victims are Dave and Lisa Bruns, the husband and spouse duo who run Exceljet.

Using their personal career information, the Bruns built a library of content material over the path of 11 years – simplest to have it scraped and replicated in a matter of hours.

And “scraped” is a higher description than “stolen.” The AI device didn’t honestly plagiarize the Bruns’ content. Instead, it created new content material from the subjects scraped off of Exceljet.

So, if there was no direct plagiarism, what’s the huge deal?

In a reply to Ward’s bragging on LinkedIn, Dave Bruns cuts to the heart of the matter.

Screenshot of David Bruns' LinkedIn CommentImage Source

“Who will solution for the AI-generated content, not reviewed or examined through each person who cares? This type of undertaking is in reality the worst of the web. It will severely degrade the excellent of the content material we human beings devour.”

Did this organization create a black hat search engine marketing roadmap?

“I suppose it’s a fair worry,” says Rory Hope.

AI makes content material introduction rapid, reasonably-priced, and clean – irrespective of best. So, if that content material performs just as nicely on the engines like google, it could quickly crowd out human-authored content completely.

“Google should be worried approximately this, and we’re seeing it inside the three core set of rules updates this 12 months,” Hope provides.

He’s speakme approximately numerous fundamental modifications Google made to its search algorithms in 2023. These algorithms are answerable for deciding what shows up whilst you make a search.

The latest updates to them aim to make certain you find content that’s genuinely useful to human beings in place of stuff that’s written to enchantment to serps.

But those modifications aren’t about casting off AI-generated content material.

“Google is in among a rock and a hard vicinity,” points out Aja Frost. “Consumers and corporations are surely distinctly inquisitive about the use of AI to improve productiveness, and Google itself is including a ton of AI-generated content material to its [search results] within the shape of the AI-powered photograph.”

In fact, they’re already rolling out the AI-better version in their own search outcomes.“But at the equal time, all people acknowledges that AI trained on AI results in a first-rate race to the bottom.”

New AI is trained on content material from the internet, so if the net is purely populated by means of AI, it turns into a photocopy of a photocopy. Each time, the issues are magnified.

The Future of the Internet

Despite that opportunity, both Frost and Hope strike an constructive tone. They’ve visible the upward push and fall of masses of methods people have attempted to trick Google.

“I suppose so long as there’s a system to recreation – and sizable economic incentives for gaming it – humans will use manipulative and inherently degrading strategies,” says Frost.

She maintains, “In the early days of the internet, that became key-word stuffing and inappropriate link-constructing. These days, it’s AI-generated content produced without a ‘human inside the loop.’”

However, she factors out that Google has a economic incentive of its very own.

“If Google’s effects end up saturated with ‘AI-spun rubbish,’ customers won’t use Google anymore. I suppose that, as opposed to prohibiting AI for content era absolutely, Google will consistently increase the significance of human ‘signals’ in every algorithm replace.”

Hope echoes that sentiment.

“Google desires to higher understand the EEAT of content in its war with low-fine AI junk mail.”

EEAT refers to the standards that Google makes use of to determine the credibility of a website: Expertise, Experience, Authority, and Trustworthiness.

“EEAT is simplest going to emerge as extra important, to the point in which it’s a great deal more difficult for purely AI-generated content material to rank,” Frost consents.

“Not to mention Google up to date its Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines to location a extra emphasis on factually correct content,” adds Hope. “I’m positive that in the end, Google will figure it out, and it'll force SEOs to adapt into better content material entrepreneurs.”

This follows the ordinary sample among Google and bad actors, in line with Frost.

“Google and other algorithms will maintain evolving their systems to punish bad actors, and bad actors will maintain arising with new approaches to quickly outmaneuver those systems,” she says. “So no, I don’t think AI is the downfall of the net.”

Black Hat Techniques Work, But Not Forever

Google appears to have subsequently caught on to Ward’s shenanigans.

“Since Ward’s X post went viral, his web site’s natural visitors has decreased with the aid of 42%,” says Frost.

Here’s an up to date look at the “stolen” site visitors at the time of writing.

Graph of traffic displaying a guide penalty

So what do Frost and Hope have to mention to individuals who might be tempted to try Ward’s tactic for themselves?

“Publicly crowing about manipulating Google’s outcomes is commonly a one-way avenue to penalization,” says Frost. “[But] I don’t believe in the usage of this method under the radar, either.”

Penalty apart, she factors out that the price of the content is questionable.

“I imagine its conversion rate was extremely low. Humans normally convert on content material they consider, and popular, persona-less, ‘AI via AI’ content material is inherently untrustworthy.”

Hope takes a greater forceful tone.

“I strongly suggest no one to undertake this method of scraping URLs and the use of AI to mass produce content,” he says. “It might be unhelpful, and your whole website online will subsequently be hit, both with a site-wide overall performance dampener or a guide penalty.”

But that doesn’t suggest you need to avoid AI altogether.

“AI gives humans extra time for all the work that can’t and shouldn’t be generated,” says Frost. “From interviewing specialists, compiling first-celebration statistics, crafting original insights, and greater.”

“Google has stated it’s ok to use AI whilst developing content material,” adds Hope. “However, all your content desires to be beneficial, dependable, human beings-first content, in line with their pointers. If you use generative AI to ‘spin’ up content material at scale, it will no longer be useful, reliable, nor people-first.”

socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions socialinhibitions